- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 10:08:42 +0200
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
On Sep 11, 2011, at 21:31 , Jeni Tennison wrote: > Ivan, > > On 11 Sep 2011, at 05:45, Ivan Herman wrote: >> I do not think we have a disagreement on the goal. However, from a purely procedural point of view: The HTML5+RDFa document is _not_ published by the RDFWA Working Group! The only thing this group can do is to express its support on something that has to be accepted by the HTML5 Working Group. >> >> Formally, what this would mean is to file an issue with the HTML5 Working Group. I must admit that this may have been my mistake not to do that when I added an issue on this for this group, but I am not 100% sure I am familiar with the HTML 5 WG procedures. Maybe Manu can tell us what the most efficient approach would be. Manu, can this working group file a formal issue, for example? > > > Ah, my apologies. I assumed that since Manu and Shane were the editors that this group was in control of the spec. If it would be easier for me to raise the bug, let me know. I actually believe it would be better if you did it, yes. Thanks! Ivan P.S. I presume we can formally close the issue in the RDFWA WG, right? > > Jeni > -- > Jeni Tennison > http://www.jenitennison.com > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 12 September 2011 08:08:40 UTC