- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 06:51:00 +0200
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>, public-rdfa-wg <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
And, per the decision of yesterday, @inlist it is... Ivan ---- Ivan Herman Tel:+31 641044153 http://www.ivan-herman.net On 15 Sep 2011, at 21:33, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > Niklas, Ivan, > > I agree with Ivan's comments, with the exception of the attribute name: > > On 15 Sep 2011, at 12:18, Ivan Herman wrote: >> On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:50 , Niklas Lindström wrote: >>> 1. I wonder whether "member" is an appropriate name for the attribute triggering list processing. My concern is that it may not fully convey the specific list nature of the feature (since "member" conceptually also applies to the default "set" nature). I'd suggest e.g. "listitem" or "inlist". >> >> I agree that @member is not good. I think you suggested @onlist last time, and I actually like that one… > > I think that @inlist is better than @onlist, and prefer @listitem or @member to both. But that's just me :) > > Jeni > -- > Jeni Tennison > http://www.jenitennison.com >
Received on Friday, 16 September 2011 04:50:12 UTC