Re: Updated the primer

On Sep 6, 2011, at 17:21 , Shane McCarron wrote:

> I agree that leaving @prefix to later in the document makes more sense.  We are encouraging people to use either 1) the default profile that has all the goodness they need, or 2) @vocab to get to a specific collection of terms they require that is not already in the profile, or 3) both.
> 

Thanks for the feedback. I will think about restructuring the doc. But not today:-)

Ivan


> On 9/6/2011 10:12 AM, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> 
>> I did an update on the RDFa 1.1 Primer[1]. Apart from cosmetics, I have:
>> 
>> - removed the section on profiles, left only the default profiles
>> - in the examples, where appropriate, I tried to use @vocab wherever possible, mainly in the advanced pages at the end
>> - I added a section on using full URIs
>> 
>> I am wondering whether a restructuring or change in the document would not be better, namely to introduce vocab on the top as part of the 'start', and then take it from there. At present the story begins with the usage of prefixes. I will think about it and maybe restructure things that way...
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/sources/rdfa-primer/Overview-src.html
>> 
>> ----
>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
>> mobile: +31-641044153
>> PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Shane McCarron
> Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc.
> +1 763 786 8160 x120
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf

Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 15:24:35 UTC