- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 01:15:45 -0400
- To: KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-rdfa-wg@w3.org" <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
There may be some other things we can do, other than @version, to look for 1.0 compatibility. For example, @xmlns is (somewhat) deprecated in RDFa 1.1, and is really necessary in 1.0. We could potentially look for cues other than @version to determine if this is 1.1 mode. Gregg On Sep 15, 2011, at 6:53 PM, KANZAKI Masahide wrote: > 2011/9/13 Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>: >> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 4:56 PM, KANZAKI Masahide <mkanzaki@gmail.com> wrote: >>> There are several tutorials/articles that introduced @src usage in >>> RDFa 1.0, e.g. >> >> This is important to consider. However, I think the situation is >> mitigated by the fact that hanging rels pick up both @about and >> @href/@resource. Hence even if @src is changed in RDFa 1.1 to behave >> like the latter, any code using a hanging rel to link to the image >> will still work. > > The tutorials/articles I posted are just a few examples, e.g. I wrote > a book explaining @src usage in detail in 2009. > > And point is not there are some tutorials/articles, but some users > possibly wrote RDFa instances according to those examples. Who knows. > It's not realistic to tell those users to change @src usage, or to add > @version. > > -- > @prefix : <http://www.kanzaki.com/ns/sig#> . <> :from [:name > "KANZAKI Masahide"; :nick "masaka"; :email "mkanzaki@gmail.com"]. >
Received on Friday, 16 September 2011 05:16:38 UTC