SPARQL last call: keyword index?
Late, but possibly useful, comments on SPARQL Last Call WD
mischaracterisation of my comments on SPARQL Query Langage last draft
[OK?] paper on RDF querying relevant to DAWG (and to current discussions)
Fwd: RE: Comments on STRING [OK?][closed]
Late comment on DESCRIBE
Comments on STRING
[OK?] Re: SPARQL: format based on Unicode?
Re: comments on Section 1 and Section 2 of SPARQL Query Language for RDF [OK?] [needstest]
RE: Belated comments on SPARQL Protocol for RDF 25 January 2006 LC WD
- RE: Belated comments on SPARQL Protocol for RDF 25 January 2006 LC WD
- RE: Belated comments on SPARQL Protocol for RDF 25 January 2006 LC WD
- RE: Belated comments on SPARQL Protocol for RDF 25 January 2006 LC WD
Re: comment on wording at beginning of SPARQL Query Language for RDF [closed]
Re: minor technical on 10.1 Solution sequences and result forms [OK?]
[OK?] (entailment, soundness, completeness)
Re: DAWG disjunction objection [closed]
Re: Comments on Feb 20 Working Draft of SPARQL [OK?]
Re: SPARQL Dataset Graph Pattern
Re: SPARQL: arguments for built-in calls to generic? [OK?]
Re: comment on wording at beginning of SPARQL Query Language for RDF [OK?]
[CLOSED] Typos in SPARQL
Re: Some typos in SPARQL spec
[OK?] Typos in SPARQL
Typo in SPARQL
Re: [OK?] Re: Comments on SPARQL protocol document
Re: [OK?] Re: some questions on ORDER BY[closed]
Comment: don't use ? and $. Pick one.
[OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Non-respect for RDF Semantics)
- Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Non-respect for RDF Semantics)
- [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Non-respect for RDF Semantics)
- Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Non-respect for RDF Semantics)
- Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Non-respect for RDF Semantics)
- Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Non-respect for RDF Semantics)
- Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Non-respect for RDF Semantics)
- Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF"
- Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Non-respect for RDF Semantics)
- Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Non-respect for RDF Semantics)
- Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Non-respect for RDF Semantics)
- Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Non-respect for RDF Semantics)