- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 08:12:54 -0500 (EST)
- To: franconi@inf.unibz.it
- Cc: eric@w3.org, connolly@w3.org, public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
From: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it> Subject: Re: [OK] Re: [OK?] Re: comments on "SPARQL Query Language for RDF" (Non-respect for RDF Semantics) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 00:43:21 +0100 > On 7 Mar 2006, at 00:26, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > >>> (This also depends on just how the scoping graph is determined.) > >> > >> Mmhh, I'd say that it does not depend on that: the answer is uniquely > >> determined up to bnode renaming. Why are you saying that? > > > > Well, changing the scoping graph can change the permissable > > answers, or at > > least that is what I believe based on the SPARL documents. > > The scoping graph is always isomorphic to the original dataset - the > only things that may change are the names of the bnodes. This has no > effect on the answer set, apart from having possibly different bnode > names. > > --e. Sorry, I meant scoping *set*. peter
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2006 13:13:03 UTC