Re: Belated comments on SPARQL Protocol for RDF 25 January 2006 LC WD

On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:

> I assumed we were using that. Kendall, are we not?
> Hmm.

I think we were, but it got dropped at some point. I was confused for  
a while about whether it was the default for a GET binding, and then  
we added POST, so I wasn't sure what to do. I'm still not especially  
sure. :>

The operation is safe when bound to GET, obviously, and it's actually  
also safe when bound to POST, but I don't know if you can say *that*  
in WSDL.

Advice from the WSDL folks would be really helpful on this point. :>


Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2006 18:08:11 UTC