- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:54:54 +0000
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Kendall, I've been sitting on your messages for some while, and still haven't found time to refresh my position. Based on your direct responses I'll say that, unless I do actually come back with any further comments, that you have indeed been responsive to my comments concerning: over-prescriptivity generation of warnings spoofed server responses #g -- Kendall Clark wrote: > > On Jan 17, 2006, at 4:29 PM, Kendall Clark wrote: > >> >> On Sep 16, 2005, at 9:31 AM, Graham Klyne wrote: >>> I would probably focus any such suggestions on security mechanisms, >>> and leave the policy specification/decision mechanisms to be >>> application-dependent. >> >> The latest editor's draft of the protocol spec removes all privacy >> policy discussion. Is that responsive to yr comments about >> over-prescriptivity? > > Oops, sorry, Graham, I should have included a link: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/proto-wd/ > > Cheers, > Kendall > > -- Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Monday, 6 March 2006 14:58:09 UTC