- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:10:15 -0600
- To: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 13:01 -0800, Dave Beckett wrote: > When I was a DAWG working group member, I objected to disjunction: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#disjunction > on the grounds of implementation cost. > > At this time over a year later, there are people who have implemented > it, so I'd withdraw my personal objection to it (I am not speaking for > my current or former employers). > > However, I've still not found the time in the last year to implement it > myself in Rasqal, or can see that changing anytime soon. Other parts of > SPARQL are higher priority to me. Noted in Revision 1.134 2006/03/20 23:09:12 > Dave -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 23:10:25 UTC