Re: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs [OK?]
disjunction, query language, data representation ...
Voce e muito especial . . . hugo
Re: Traversing trees with sparql? [OK?]
[closed]: Roman Numeral test Was: Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch."
Re: twinql Retrospective
Re: Comments on last-call SPARQL draft 20050721, sections 3 onwards
Re: Comments on last-call SPARQL draft 20050721, section 2
Re: SPARQL Protocol Privacy section
Section 3 of SPARQL protocol partially out of scope.
CONSTRUCT: allow *?
sparql describe - options?!
Double binding of a WSDL 2.0 operation
[CLOSED]: Roman Numeral test Was: Bug: "A value disjunction..."
Re: Comments [OK?]
Re: General Document Comments [OK?]
Re: Comments on SPARQL: Semantics of queries involving named graphs [OK?]
Re: Comments on SPARQL: Querying the Dataset [OK?]
[OK?] Re: SPARQL: language tag issues
[OK?] Re: SPARQL: isURI poorly named
[OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations
Re: Namespaces
Re: [comments] Note about WSDL2 Binding
Re: need extar information in SPARQL [OK?]
Re: SPARQL: Editorial comments on Last Call WD [OK?]
Re: Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art
- Re: Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art
- [CLOSED] Re: Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art