public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from November 2005 by date

Wednesday, 23 November 2005

• Re: disjunction, query language, data representation ... Jeen Broekstra
• Re: Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs [OK?] Seaborne, Andy
• disjunction, query language, data representation ... Don Cohen

Tuesday, 22 November 2005

• Voce e muito especial . . . hugo hugo
• Re: SPARQL: language tag issues Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: SPARQL: language tag issues Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [closed] Re: twinql Retrospective Richard Newman
• Re: Traversing trees with sparql? [OK?] Dan Connolly
• [closed]: Roman Numeral test Was: Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch." Dan Connolly
• Re: twinql Retrospective Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on last-call SPARQL draft 20050721, sections 3 onwards Dan Connolly
• Re: Comments on last-call SPARQL draft 20050721, section 2 Dan Connolly
• Re: SPARQL: language tag issues Dan Connolly

Monday, 21 November 2005

• Re: SPARQL Protocol Privacy section Rigo Wenning

Friday, 18 November 2005

• Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? Richard Newman
• Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? Patrick Stickler
• Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? Seaborne, Andy

Thursday, 17 November 2005

• Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? Richard Newman
• Section 3 of SPARQL protocol partially out of scope. Thomas Roessler
• Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? Dan Connolly
• Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? Richard Newman

Wednesday, 16 November 2005

• CONSTRUCT: allow *? Leo Sauermann

Tuesday, 15 November 2005

• Re: sparql describe - options?! Patrick Stickler
• Re: sparql describe - options?! Richard Newman
• sparql describe - options?! Leo Sauermann
• Double binding of a WSDL 2.0 operation paul.downey@bt.com

Monday, 14 November 2005

• [CLOSED] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations Bjoern Hoehrmann
• [CLOSED]: Roman Numeral test Was: Bug: "A value disjunction..." Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Comments [CLOSED] Seaborne, Andy

Friday, 11 November 2005

• Re: Comments [OK?] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: [OK?] Re: SPARQL: language tag issues Bjoern Hoehrmann

Thursday, 10 November 2005

• RE: General Document Comments [CLOSED] Ryan Levering
• [CLOSED] Re: SPARQL: Editorial comments on Last Call WD [OK?] Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 9 November 2005

• Re: General Document Comments [OK?] Seaborne, Andy
• Re: Comments on SPARQL: Semantics of queries involving named graphs [OK?] Jeen Broekstra
• Re: Comments on SPARQL: Querying the Dataset [OK?] Jeen Broekstra

Tuesday, 8 November 2005

• [CLOSED] Re: Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art Jacco van Ossenbruggen
• [OK?] Re: SPARQL: language tag issues Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [OK?] Re: SPARQL: isURI poorly named Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [OK?] Re: SPARQL: isURI poorly named Eric Prud'hommeaux
• [OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations Eric Prud'hommeaux

Monday, 7 November 2005

• Re: Namespaces Richard Newman
• Re: [comments] Note about WSDL2 Binding Karl Dubost
• Re: [comments] Note about WSDL2 Binding Dan Connolly
• Re: need extar information in SPARQL [OK?] Dan Connolly
• Re: SPARQL: Editorial comments on Last Call WD [OK?] Seaborne, Andy

Saturday, 5 November 2005

• Re: Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art [OK?] Dan Connolly
• Re: Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art Dan Connolly
• Re: Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art Seaborne, Andy
• SPARQL Comments (Personal) David Wood

Friday, 4 November 2005

• Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples Kendall Clark
• Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples Leigh Dodds
• Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples Kendall Clark
• Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples Leigh Dodds

Thursday, 3 November 2005

• Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples Kendall Clark
• Re: Query By Reference in SPARQL Protocol Leigh Dodds
• Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples Leigh Dodds
• Re: Query By Reference in SPARQL Protocol Kendall Clark
• Re: SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples Kendall Clark

Tuesday, 1 November 2005

• SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples Leigh Dodds
• Query By Reference in SPARQL Protocol Leigh Dodds
• HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused Leigh Dodds

Last message date: Wednesday, 23 November 2005 12:06:34 UTC