- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:09:58 -0600
- To: Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 18:31 +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > > Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I am working in something that uses SPARQL, neverminde, so I read the > > SPARQL draft amd there are some points that I hope someone explain them to me. We're interested to know if you find the explanation below sufficient. You might also consult mailing lists such as semantic-web@w3.org. > > I want to know how to construct the database because it is not clear as it > > contains default and named graphes? Do you have one database or many? when we > > have different databases, do I construct the merge? when we have different FROM > > and FROM NAMED we project the query in the merge of the databases or in each > > one at a time. How we construct the default and the named graphes and how we > > store them? > > > > The current SPARQL query language specification does not include any > fucntionality for loading RDF data into a persistent store. You will need to > consult the documentation for the implementation you are using for how to do > that. Many toolkits provide ways to load RDF data without needing to > understand the details of the persistent storage. > > FROM and FROM NAMED describe the RDF dataset to be queried but don't enforce a > a fixed mechanism for creating or loading the graphs. > > Andy > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 19:10:04 UTC