- From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:09:05 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Bump, because this hasn't yet been acknowledged, and it's an existing issue (though I forget the reference), so several people would like it dealt with. -R On 26 Oct 2005, at 23:08, Richard Newman wrote: > Howdy, > In "Namespaces:", immediately preceding <http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf- > sparql-query/#operandDataTypes>: > > --- > The namespace for XPath functions that are directly available by > name is http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions. The associated > namespace prefix used in this document is fn:. XPath operators are > named with the prefix op:, XML Schema datatypes with the prefix > op:, and types of RDF terms with the prefix r:. SPARQL operators > are named with the prefix sop:. > --- > > So, > > fn: = http://www.w3.org/2004/07/xpath-functions. > > I have two preliminary observations: > > 1. "XML Schema datatypes with the prefix op:". Shouldn't this be > xs:, judging by §11.1, or xsd:, following convention? > 2. The only namespace prefixes listed in §1.1 are rdf:, rdfs:, and > xsd:. AFAICS, this leaves: > a) fn: defined, but not listed in §1.1 > b) op:, sop:, xs:, and r: without a definition that I can see in > this document. > > Thoughts? If someone knows the URI for sop:, I'd very much like > to be corrected, as I'm trying to write that part of twinql :) > > Thanks, > -R
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 20:09:09 UTC