- From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:23:44 -0800
- To: Leo Sauermann <leo@gnowsis.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
> This would also give implementors a better definition of what they > MAY do in their implementations, allowing to quick-start with > existing code or at least an exact decision what is good here (and > year-long experience). It may be of interest to the WG that twinql already uses CBDs as its concept of a description. Optional parameters to be provided to a DESCRIBE might be useful, but the use of CBDs is certainly a good initial recommendation. -R
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 23:23:49 UTC