- From: Leigh Dodds <leigh@ldodds.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:04:34 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Hi, Couple of points of feedback on the spec examples: There's a minor problem with the response example in "2.2.1.5 DESCRIBE with simple RDF dataset". I think the Content-Type should be application/rdf+xml in line with [1] rather than application/sparql-results+xml. Secondly, I think it would be useful if the fault examples demonstrated the use of the malformed-query and query-request-refused. The first example returns plain-text, the second an HTML document. For consistency, i.e. always returning XML, I think it would be nicer if faults MUST return one of those elements and SHOULD include a human-readable error message. [1]. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-MIME-Type Cheers, L.
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2005 21:04:42 UTC