Re: [comments] Note about WSDL2 Binding

Hi Dan,

Le 05-11-07 à 14:16, Dan Connolly a écrit :
>>      [[[
>>      (Note: The bindings shown here are not legal according
>>      to the latest draft of WSDL 2.0 recommendation.
>
> You might be interested in some recent progress, including
> re-opening a WG issue:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#wsdlAbstractProtocol
>
> In particular, re limitations of {http output serialization},
> it looks like there are updates to WSDL in progress that
> better match SPARQL.
> see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-desc-comments/2005Oct/ 
> thread#19
>
> There are one or two related issues where we're still working out the
> details with the WSD WG. We'll let you know how it turns out in due
> course.

Thanks for the update and the good work going on.
I'll stay tuned.

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***