- From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:15:40 -0800
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Dan, I am satisfied by the WG's responses, thank you. -R On 21 Nov 2005, at 18:35, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 09:34 -0700, Richard Newman wrote: >> Hello all, >> As SPARQL is in last call, I've been asked to provide some >> feedback based on my experiences of implementing twinql[1]. > > Hi. I think we have now addressed all your comments. > Details below. > > Please let us know whether this reply addresses your comments > to your satisfaction. > > If you're in a particularly helpful mood, you can put [closed] > in the subject of your reply to indicate to some automted > tools that yes, you are satisfied.
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 04:15:49 UTC