[closed] Re: twinql Retrospective

   I am satisfied by the WG's responses, thank you.


On 21 Nov 2005, at 18:35, Dan Connolly wrote:

> On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 09:34 -0700, Richard Newman wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>    As SPARQL is in last call, I've been asked to provide some
>> feedback based on my experiences of implementing twinql[1].
> Hi. I think we have now addressed all your comments.
> Details below.
> Please let us know whether this reply addresses your comments
> to your satisfaction.
> If you're in a particularly helpful mood, you can put [closed]
> in the subject of your reply to indicate to some automted
> tools that yes, you are satisfied.

Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 04:15:49 UTC