public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org from November 2005 by subject

[CLOSED] Re: Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art

[CLOSED] Re: SPARQL: Editorial comments on Last Call WD [OK?]

[CLOSED] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations

[closed] Re: twinql Retrospective

[closed]: Roman Numeral test Was: Bug: "A value disjunction that encounters a type error on only one branch will return the result of evaluating the other branch."

[CLOSED]: Roman Numeral test Was: Bug: "A value disjunction..."

[comments] Note about WSDL2 Binding

[OK?] Re: SPARQL: isURI poorly named

[OK?] Re: SPARQL: language tag issues

[OK?] Re: SPARQL: Security Considerations

Comments [CLOSED]

Comments [OK?]

Comments on last-call SPARQL draft 20050721, section 2

Comments on last-call SPARQL draft 20050721, sections 3 onwards

Comments on SPARQL from the XML Query and the XSL WGs [OK?]

Comments on SPARQL: Querying the Dataset [OK?]

Comments on SPARQL: Semantics of queries involving named graphs [OK?]

CONSTRUCT: allow *?

disjunction, query language, data representation ...

Double binding of a WSDL 2.0 operation

General Document Comments [CLOSED]

General Document Comments [OK?]

HTTP Status Codes for QueryRequestRefused

Namespaces

need extar information in SPARQL [OK?]

Query By Reference in SPARQL Protocol

Section 3 of SPARQL protocol partially out of scope.

SPARQL Comments (Personal)

sparql describe - options?!

Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art

Sparql editorial comment: acknowledge prior art [OK?]

SPARQL Protocol Privacy section

SPARQL Protocol Spec Examples

SPARQL: Editorial comments on Last Call WD [OK?]

SPARQL: language tag issues

Traversing trees with sparql? [OK?]

twinql Retrospective

Voce e muito especial . . . hugo

Last message date: Wednesday, 23 November 2005 12:06:34 UTC