- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:50:55 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
For the scripts ... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Comments [OK?] Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:06:00 +0100 From: Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr References: <1130310405.435f2b05113a6@listes-serv.inrialpes.fr> <4374890E.5070004@hp.com> CLOSED Best regards Faisal Alkhateeb Quoting "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>: > > > > Faisal.Alkhateeb@inrialpes.fr wrote: > > Hello, > > > > During reading the SPARQL LC draft, I have the following comments: > > > > - In the paragraph that start with the "Abbreviated blank node syntax > can be > > combined with other abbreviations for common predicates and common objects" > > > under the subject "Blank nodes". I think it is "... for common > subjects". > > > > Faisal Alkhateeb > > Thank you for the correction : the text inteh editors' working draft is > now: > > """ > Abbreviated blank node syntax can be combined with other abbreviations for > common subjects and predicates. > """ > > If this message addresses the comments raised, please could you respond > with > [CLOSED] in the subject line to allow the issue tracking scripts to close > this > issue. > > Thanks > Andy > > > >
Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 15:51:45 UTC