Thursday, 29 July 2004
- RE: [DM] 7.7.3 Construction (of text nodes) from an Infoset
- [DM] 7.7.3 Construction (of text nodes) from an Infoset
Wednesday, 28 July 2004
- RE: [XSLT 2.0] key/@as
- RE: [F&O]: Result of arithmetic involving Inf
- RE: well-known namespace prefixes
- RE: well-known namespace prefixes
Tuesday, 27 July 2004
- well-known namespace prefixes
- RE: [F&O]: Result of arithmetic involving Inf
- [F&O]: Result of arithmetic involving Inf
Monday, 26 July 2004
- RE: [F&O] Broken link to image in current draft
- page-position="Last" problem
- XQuery and XSLT WGs publish five interim Working Drafts
- [F&O] Broken link to image in current draft
- RE: [F&O] Section 15.2 FS references
- Re: [XPath] 3.2.1 Steps: fn:get-namespace-uri-for-prefix
- RE: [XPath] 3.2.1 Steps: fn:get-namespace-uri-for-prefix
- [XPath] 3.2.1 Steps: fn:get-namespace-uri-for-prefix
- [F&O] Section 15.2 FS references
- [F&O] Section 15.3 deep equal examples
- [F&O] Sections 14/15: assume an XQuery
Tuesday, 20 July 2004
- [general] length of specifications
- RE: [Serial] additional last call comment about xml:lang
- [Removed - forged post with attachments]:
Thursday, 15 July 2004
- [F&O] CER-09 xs:double parameters to fn:substring
- ORA-FO-250-B: Inconsistent types for $position in various functions.
- ORA-FO-182-B: function names are too long
- [F&O] IBM-FO-036: Inconsistent parameter types
Wednesday, 14 July 2004
Tuesday, 13 July 2004
- Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments [22]
- Re: [XSLT2.0]
- Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments [6]
- Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments [22]
- Re: ORA-SE-300-B: Implementation-defined output methods need not normalize
- Re: ORA-SE-308-C: What circumstances are meant by "in all other circumstances"?
- Re: [Serialization] MS-SER-LC1-001
- Re: [Serialization] SCHEMA-D
- Re: [Serialization] IBM-SE-010: Namespace nodes after round-trip
- [public-qt-comments] <none>
- Re: Serialization (sometimes) needs to include type information
Sunday, 11 July 2004
- One more typo in XPath 2.0 Requirements
- Another typo in XPath 2.0 Requirements
- Typo in XPath 2.0 Requirements
Saturday, 10 July 2004
Friday, 9 July 2004
- FS comments by Microsoft
- [FS] Editorial comments on section 7
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-107
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-104
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-094
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-093
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-092
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-091
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-090
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-086
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-083
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-085
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-082
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-079
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-076
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-078
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-074
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-071
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-072
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-073
Thursday, 1 July 2004
Tuesday, 6 July 2004
Monday, 5 July 2004
- [FO] MS-FO-LC2-004
- F&O Which types are primitive types?
- [F+O] Rename component-from-duration() functions
- [F&O] IBM-FO-015: xdt:untypedAtomic is not a numeric type
- [F+O] Type conversion in concat()
- [F&O] IBM-FO-105: \0 should be prohibitied as a back reference in regular expressions