- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:09:03 +0100
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
I think I've commented on every other draft that deep-equal is an expensive and useless function to standardise. However this particular version does at least appear to be self consistent (at last:-) so I suppose that is something, however the examples still need clarification, 15.3.1.1 Examples fn:deep-equal($item1, $item2) returns false. Since the definition of $item2 has been elided, there is nothing to say that this has to be false, it could be that the first two items in the sequence are deep-equal as defined here. David ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit: http://www.star.net.uk ________________________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 26 July 2004 06:09:30 UTC