W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2004

[F&O] Section 15.3 deep equal examples

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:09:03 +0100
Message-Id: <200407261009.LAA02470@penguin.nag.co.uk>
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org

I think I've commented on every other draft that deep-equal is an
expensive and useless function to standardise. However this particular
version does at least appear to be self consistent (at last:-) so I
suppose that is something, however the examples still need
clarification, Examples
fn:deep-equal($item1, $item2) returns false.

Since the definition of $item2 has been elided, there is nothing to say
that this has to be false, it could be that the first two items in the
sequence are deep-equal as defined here.


This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
Received on Monday, 26 July 2004 06:09:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:56:58 UTC