Ashok Malhotra
- RE: [F&O]: Result of arithmetic involving Inf (Tuesday, 27 July)
- RE: [F&O] Section 15.2 FS references (Monday, 26 July)
- [F&O] CER-09 xs:double parameters to fn:substring (Thursday, 15 July)
- ORA-FO-250-B: Inconsistent types for $position in various functions. (Thursday, 15 July)
- ORA-FO-182-B: function names are too long (Thursday, 15 July)
- [F&O] IBM-FO-036: Inconsistent parameter types (Thursday, 15 July)
- [F&O] CER-08 position-of (Wednesday, 14 July)
- [F&O] CER-10 extract-match (Wednesday, 14 July)
- [F&O] IBM-FO-104: Description of substring matching should account for ignorable collations units (Tuesday, 6 July)
- [FO] MS-FO-LC2-004 (Monday, 5 July)
- F&O Which types are primitive types? (Monday, 5 July)
- [F+O] Rename component-from-duration() functions (Monday, 5 July)
- [F&O] IBM-FO-015: xdt:untypedAtomic is not a numeric type (Monday, 5 July)
- [F+O] Type conversion in concat() (Monday, 5 July)
- [F&O] IBM-FO-105: \0 should be prohibitied as a back reference in regular expressions (Monday, 5 July)
- ORA-FO-188-B: no defined relationship between fn:current-date and fn:current-dateTime (Sunday, 4 July)
David Carlisle
drkm
Henry Zongaro
- [F&O]: Result of arithmetic involving Inf (Tuesday, 27 July)
- Re: [XSLT2.0] (Tuesday, 13 July)
- Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments [6] (Tuesday, 13 July)
- Re: [Serial] I18N WG last call comments [22] (Tuesday, 13 July)
- Re: ORA-SE-300-B: Implementation-defined output methods need not normalize (Tuesday, 13 July)
- Re: ORA-SE-308-C: What circumstances are meant by "in all other circumstances"? (Tuesday, 13 July)
- Re: [Serialization] MS-SER-LC1-001 (Tuesday, 13 July)
- Re: [Serialization] SCHEMA-D (Tuesday, 13 July)
- Re: [Serialization] IBM-SE-010: Namespace nodes after round-trip (Tuesday, 13 July)
- [public-qt-comments] <none> (Tuesday, 13 July)
- Re: Serialization (sometimes) needs to include type information (Tuesday, 13 July)
Howard Katz
Jonathan Robie
Martin Duerst
Michael Kay
Michael Rys
- RE: [DM] 7.7.3 Construction (of text nodes) from an Infoset (Thursday, 29 July)
- RE: well-known namespace prefixes (Wednesday, 28 July)
- FS comments by Microsoft (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] Editorial comments on section 7 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-107 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-104 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-094 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-093 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-092 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-091 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-090 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-086 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-083 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-085 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-082 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-079 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-076 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-078 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-074 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-071 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-072 (Friday, 9 July)
- [FS] MS-FS-LC1-073 (Friday, 9 July)
Norman.Walsh
Paul Cotton
Paul Rabin
Sema Atavi
Last message date: Thursday, 29 July 2004 15:45:03 UTC