- From: Henry Zongaro <zongaro@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 11:38:44 -0400
- To: mrys@microsoft.com
- Cc: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Michael,
In [1], you submitted the following comment on the Last Call Working
Draft of XSLT 2.0 and XQuery 1.0 Serialization:
<<
Section 1 Introduction
Editorial
We think it may be better, if the serialization document is kept
separate, so other serialization formats can be added without impacting
the general datamodel document.
>>
Thank you for this comment.
The XSL and XML Query Working Groups discussed your comment, and
agreed that it would be best to specify the serialization process in a
separate document. The editorial note will be deleted.
I am unsure whether any representative of Microsoft, apart from the
chair of the XML Query WG, was present when this decision was made. May I
ask you to confirm that this response is acceptable to you?
Thanks,
Henry [On behalf of the XSL and XML Query Working Groups]
[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2004Feb/1195.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
Henry Zongaro Xalan development
IBM SWS Toronto Lab T/L 969-6044; Phone +1 905 413-6044
mailto:zongaro@ca.ibm.com
Received on Tuesday, 13 July 2004 11:39:26 UTC