LC Comments status for implementation of resolutions and approuval by commenter on 15-01-2011.
This status is also updated in the
LC
comment Tracker for Ontology
LC
comment Tracker for API
1- Media Ontology spec
-- LC Comment -2405: NO - partially implemented: (see review from Jean Pierre)
ACTION: Thierry will check who is responsible editors and assign task to work on these issues
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0125.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Dec/0069.html
==> Status of LC Response -2405: Approuved by email(Doug).
@@ To send the final updated Ont spec version on Doug's request.
1 Introduction
Split the relationship to Dublin Core (Action to Joakim to reword)
--> Looks like this is done.
1.1 Purpose of this specification
(Action to Joakim to add a paragraph)
make the set of classes and properties the Ontology defines and the values. and provide an implementation of the vocabulary in RDF.
--> Joakim, Is this done ?
Once the RDF is in the Spec, should respond and link to it.
It is both a metadata itself, and a mapping.
4.1.2 Core properties
column is used as a prefix for the namespace and also in the Type definition, but for another semantic
keep ma: as a prefix and change the syntax of the type definition to attribute name/attribute value pairs in prose
--> The ma: prefix still appears in the table
--> ACTION WONSUK to change the ma: prefix in the document.
The abstract and introduction should mention the definition of the RDF ontology and the mapping table that will come with it.
--> The abstract and introduction sdoes not mention the definition of the RDF ontology
-- LC Comment -2404 : NO - partially implemented: substantial addition missing
ACTION: Pierre-Antoine to send thierry the text to be included
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0093.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0085.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0094.html
→ ACTION-334 on Daniel
==> Status of LC Response-2404 : Approuved by email (Ivan Herman)
-- LC Comment -2418: NO - partially implemented (Edits are missing)
ACTION: Thierry to check implementation of LC2418 - action 320: Done
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0073.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0150.html
→ ACTION-320on Véronique
* ed3.:
-------
You have a CSS rule that sets margin-{top,bottom} to 0.3em on li and p. This makes your document quite hard to read, I have to go tinker with it in Firebug in order to go through it. Please don't change some of the fundamental style rules from the basic W3C style.
→ NOT Done, still there:
li, p { margin-top: 0.3em; margin-bottom: 0.3em; }
I had asked Wonsuk to remove the CSS from the document and link to an
external CSS page.
See: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Sep/0045.html
--> ACTION WONSUK to change CSS.
* substantial17:
----------------
→ the example of a geocoordinateis is *not added*
Resolutuon was: [About ""it MAY also define a coordinate system that can be used to interpret these measurements" Is there a controlled vocabulary for these? ", we will give an example of a geocoordinate that can be used in this case and rephrase the sentence to avoid the confusion about "interpreting the measurements" in the next version of the document.]
--> ACTION is for Daniel to write to the Geolocation WG for a suggestion.
ed19.:
-----
In general it would be helpful if you could be clearer about what the
normative statements apply to. What is it that MUST do this or that? Is
it an abstract usage of an ontology? A concrete implementation?
Something else?
-->ACTION Joakim: Is this now more clear ?
@@ To send the final updated Ont spec version on Robin's request.
-- LC Comment -2403: YES - fully implemented :
According to WG notes: "Véronique will add a Subtitles example" - NOT DONE!
Not sure what this Subtitles example really is, anyway this was not a request from the commenter but a remark from the WG therefore we can ignore
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0144.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0072.html
==> Status of LC Response -2403 : Approuved by email. (Phil Archer)
-- LC Comment -2417: OK Fully implemented example missing
ACTION: Thierry added the PLING example.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0144.html
==> Status of LC Response -2417 : Approuved by email (Renato for Pling)
-- LC Comment -2393 : OK Fully implemented (reviewed by Chris)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Dec/0045.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Dec/0022.html
==> Status of LC Response - 2393 Approuved (James Salsman )
-- LC Comment -2398 : OK Fully implemented -(reviewed by Tobias and Florian)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0091.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0074.html
==> Status of LC Response – 2398 Approuved by email(Jose Cantera)
-- LC Comment -2411: OK Fully implemented - (reviewed by Tobias)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0087.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0092.html
==> Status of LC Response – 2411 Approuved implicitly (Lack of response from Karen Coyle)
-- LC Comment -2389 : OK Fully implemented : Statement missing
Werner proposes to add text from the response to section 6 (Usage Examples) of the ontology document.
ACTION done: Werner to send text to be included in sec 6, thierry to include it
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0086.html
→ ACTION-270 on Werner
==> Status of LC Response -2389 : Approuved by email(Thomas Steiner)
________________________________________________________________________
2- Media API spec
-- LC Comment -2406 : NOT REVIEWED (To be reviewed by Tobias and Felix)
ACTION: Thierry To discuss this with Joakim and Send an email to Doug.
ACTION-379 :Tobias to review LC 2406 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/11/30-mediaann-minutes.html#action09]
ACTION-380: Felix to review LC 2406 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/11/30-mediaann-minutes.html#action10]
==> Status of LC Response – 2406: No clear approuval from Doug. He suggested to have review from web browsers. Joakim sent request for reviews to them, but no response?.
See discussion on generic interface in the Lyon F2F Minutes @@@
-- LC Comment -2394 : NO - partially implemented : text is still at beginning of section 3.1.
ACTION: Chris to implement issue from lc 2394 regarding HTML5 - HTMLMediaElement implements MediaResource
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0105.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0107.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0109.html
==> Status of LC Response – 2394 Approuved by email (Timeless).
-- LC Comment -2410 : OK : Fully implemented (reviewed by Chris)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0106.html
==> Status of LC Response - 2410 Approuved by email. (Jo Rabin)
-- LC Comment -2419 : OK : Fully implemented (reviewed by Jean Pierre)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0090.html
→ ACTION-318 Chris and Wonsuk
==> Status of LC Response – 2419: Partial approuval from Robin, depends on the final draft.
@@ To send the final updated API spec version on Robin's request.
-- LC Comment -2395 : YES - implemented : Statement added by Chris
The resolution
says "Chris will add a statement to the document to clarify why we do not
include 'exceptions' ". Searching for "exception" in the current version of the
API doc only finds the "no exceptions" statements, but no explanation. So this
is still open.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0167.html
→ ACTION-382 on Chris to add this statement: Done?
==> Status of LC Response - 2395 Approuved implicitly by commenter. (James Salsman )
________________________________________________________________________
3- Misc
Ont-Doc: Missing Xpaths
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0140.html