- From: ÀÌ¿ø¼® <wslee@etri.re.kr>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:33:41 +0900
- To: <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <B4EAD1122C31304099A5CDEA5447210F023A2595@email2>
Dear all, I have done three AIs as below Concerning to ACTION-328, review of ontology comment 2389, I am in the same position with Werner¡¯s opinion [1] Concerning to ACTION-337, review of ontology comment 2405, I don¡¯t have more issues than the listed items in the agenda [2]. ACTION-351 has been done. Concerning to the rest of my AIs, at this moment, I missed the point of ACTION-356. So I don¡¯t know how can I handle this L Sorry to say that. And ACTION-309 will be done later. In addition, Concerning to the API spec, I would like to know the consensus of the group for my API proposal [3]. Because it was not applied to the spec yet. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0086.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Dec/0068.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Nov/0059.html Best regards, Wonsuk.
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2010 08:34:18 UTC