- From: Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:31:29 +0100
- To: tmichel@w3.org
- CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Thanks very much for this notification and the positive resolution. Cheers Phil. On 29/09/2010 07:54, Thierry MICHEL wrote: > Dear Phil, > > The Media Annotations Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent > [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Ontology for Media > Resource 1.0 published on 08 June 2010. > Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send > us comments. > > The Working Group's response to your comment is included below. > Please review it carefully and *let us know by email at > public-media-annotation@w3.org if you agree with it* or not before > deadline date [09-oct-2010]. > In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific > solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. > If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the > opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by > the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in > the W3C Recommendation Track. > > Thanks, > > For the Media Annotations Working Group, > Thierry Michel, > W3C Team Contact > > 1. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Jun/0109.html > > 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-mediaont-10-20100608/ > > ----------------- > MAWG Resolution: > ----------------- > > Yes. We agreed that your proposal is valuable. So we will add a new > informative section to show how to use the ontology in other W3C > technologies like POWDER, RDFa, etc. > In case of POWDER, we will use your example. >
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2010 12:32:44 UTC