public-grddl-comments@w3.org from January to March 2007 by author

boland@nist.gov

• Re: RFC 2119 keywords, prose, and Conformance Re: experience generating EARL for GRDDL test results (Tuesday, 16 January)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: RFC 2119 keywords, prose, and Conformance Re: experience generating EARL for GRDDL test results (Tuesday, 16 January)

Chimezie Ogbuji

• Re: Javascript and GRDDL [#issue-whichlangs] (Tuesday, 6 March)

Dan Connolly

• Re: RDF Model vs Serialization (Language) (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: Please declare in GRDDL spec that XML validation is not required (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Javascript and GRDDL [#issue-whichlangs] (Saturday, 3 March)
• Re: Raptor 1.4.14 GRDDL 2006-10-24 implementation report (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: (formal) comment on security considerations (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: (formal) comment on security considerations (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Please declare in GRDDL spec that XML validation is not required (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: experience generating EARL for GRDDL test results (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: experience generating EARL for GRDDL test results (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: Raptor 1.4.14 GRDDL 2006-10-24 implementation report (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: Announce: Jena GRDDL Reader (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: More on GRDDL tests (GrddlImplementations) (Wednesday, 24 January)
• Re: missing rdf: in grokXMDP.xsl (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: More on GRDDL tests (apology) (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: relationship between GRDDL spec and http://www.w3.org/2003/g/glean-profile (Monday, 22 January)
• Re: comments on GRDDL tests (base URIs) (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: comments on GRDDL tests (degenerate case of RDF in GRDDL, #issue-mt-ns) (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: comments on GRDDL tests (mime types and atom/turtle) (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: comments on GRDDL tests (Wednesday, 17 January)
• Re: experience generating EARL for GRDDL test results (Monday, 15 January)
• experience generating EARL for GRDDL test results (Friday, 12 January)

Danny Ayers

• Re: Javascript and GRDDL (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: (formal) comment on security considerations (Tuesday, 13 February)

Dave Beckett

• Re: Please declare in GRDDL spec that XML validation is not required (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Raptor GRDDL tests update - pass all tests but 1 or 2 (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: GRDDL test #xinclude: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/xinclude2.xml content is broken (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: GRDDL test #xinclude: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/xinclude2.xml content is broken (Monday, 12 February)
• GRDDL test #xinclude: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/xinclude2.xml content is broken (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Raptor 1.4.14 GRDDL 2006-10-24 implementation report (Saturday, 10 February)
• Please declare in GRDDL spec that XML validation is not required (Saturday, 10 February)
• Raptor 1.4.14 GRDDL 2006-10-24 implementation report (Wednesday, 7 February)

Elliotte Harold

• Security: read vs. write (Monday, 5 March)

Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo

• RE: experience generating EARL for GRDDL test results (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: experience generating EARL for GRDDL test results (Tuesday, 16 January)

Hammond, Tony

• RE: RDF Model vs Serialization (Language) (Monday, 19 March)
• RDF Model vs Serialization (Language) (Wednesday, 14 March)

Harry Halpin

• Re: Security: read vs. write (Wednesday, 21 March)
• Re: Javascript and GRDDL (Friday, 2 March)
• Re: Please declare in GRDDL spec that XML validation is not required (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: (formal) comment on security considerations (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: GRDDL test #xinclude: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/xinclude2.xml content is broken (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Persistent Hosting for Common Ontologies (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: GRDDL and HTML (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: GRDDL and HTML (Tuesday, 9 January)

Henry S. Thompson

• XML Schema WG feedback on GRDDL Last Call WD (Tuesday, 27 March)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: Security: read vs. write (Friday, 30 March)
• Re: editorial informal comments on editor's draft (Tuesday, 27 March)
• Re: Raptor 1.4.14 GRDDL 2006-10-24 implementation report (Wednesday, 28 February)
• editorial informal comments on editor's draft (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [Jena-devel] (formal) comment on security considerations (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: (formal) comment on security considerations (Wednesday, 14 February)
• (formal) comment on security considerations (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: Raptor 1.4.14 GRDDL 2006-10-24 implementation report (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Some more tests (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Permitted URLs for transformations/schemas/profiles (Thursday, 1 February)
• Announce: Jena GRDDL Reader (Thursday, 1 February)
• more on security (Friday, 26 January)
• additional tests + security issues (Thursday, 25 January)
• Re: relationship between GRDDL spec and http://www.w3.org/2003/g/glean-profile (Tuesday, 23 January)
• Re: More on GRDDL tests (apology) (Tuesday, 23 January)
• missing rdf: in grokXMDP.xsl (Monday, 22 January)
• More on GRDDL tests (apology) (Monday, 22 January)
• relationship between GRDDL spec and http://www.w3.org/2003/g/glean-profile (Saturday, 20 January)
• **Dangerous Filename** More on GRDDL tests (Saturday, 20 January)
• Re: comments on GRDDL tests (base URIs) (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: comments on GRDDL tests (degenerate case of RDF in GRDDL, #issue-mt-ns) (Friday, 19 January)
• Re: comments on GRDDL tests (mime types and atom/turtle) (Friday, 19 January)
• comments on GRDDL tests (Wednesday, 17 January)

Karl Dubost

• RFC 2119 keywords, prose, and Conformance Re: experience generating EARL for GRDDL test results (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Fwd: experience generating EARL for GRDDL test results (Monday, 15 January)

Norman Gray

• Re: GRDDL and HTML (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: GRDDL and HTML (Tuesday, 9 January)

Shadi Abou-Zahra

• Re: RFC 2119 keywords, prose, and Conformance Re: experience generating EARL for GRDDL test results (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: experience generating EARL for GRDDL test results (Tuesday, 16 January)
• Re: experience generating EARL for GRDDL test results (Monday, 15 January)

Simone Onofri

• comment (always editorial) for GRDDL spec (Wednesday, 21 February)

Stefano Mazzocchi

• Re: Javascript and GRDDL [#issue-whichlangs] (Sunday, 4 March)
• Re: Javascript and GRDDL (Saturday, 3 March)

T.Heath

• Persistent Hosting for Common Ontologies (Thursday, 8 February)

Last message date: Friday, 30 March 2007 11:22:09 UTC