- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 09:29:54 -0600
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: public-grddl-comments@w3.org, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
responding to only part of the message... On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 14:11 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > Summary: current spec is fine on profile document. It could explicitly > say that the GRDDL profile does not have a profileTransformation, hence > licensing not reading the GRDDL profile ever. right; the draft is currently frozen for review, so please help me remember that. There is currently a relevant @@: "@@freeze the triples from the GRDDL namespace document in a test case." The test should probably not be "these are exactly the triples" but "the triples in that document don't include anything with predicate profileTransformation". It might be nice to do something like the RDFa test harness, where the test hypothesis is not "and the output is equivalent to this graph" but rather "and the output passes this SPARQL ASK query", though that would introduce a dependency on SPARQL in the test harness. Hmm.... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 28 February 2007 15:30:12 UTC