- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 15:01:10 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: public-grddl-comments@w3.org, "McBride, Brian" <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
On Jan 17, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: [...] > 5) Bigger issue > I initially got confused, because for some of the tests the input and > output documents contain different RDF! (Not just the testlist1 > document). The problem is that the files are identical (i.e. the > output files are exactly what an XSLT transform would produce). > But, the original document is read with one base, e.g. > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1.html > and the output document is read with a different one, e.g. > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1.rdf > This gives different results. Well, yeah; so don't do that. > For that particular case, I passed the test (modulo point 1), by using > content negotiation to get the two versions of the file from > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist1 This business of using the test manifests as a test case is sorta cute, but it's not something I'm putting a priority on. For the tests that are actually in the current manifests, I think the base URIs of the input documents are reasonably clear. > For some of the tests this cannot be done, since they do not have a > common URL with content negotiation. Really? Which tests? > I am not sure what change I am suggesting. In my code, I end up > reading the output file as if it were from the input file, before > comparing the two RDF graphs. exactly. > Jeremy > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 20:01:30 UTC