Re: (formal) comment on security considerations

• From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
• Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 11:14:48 +0000
• To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
• CC: public-grddl-comments@w3.org, jena-devel <jena-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
• Message-ID: <45D2EF28.9090704@hpl.hp.com>

Harry Halpin wrote:
> Jeremy,
>    
>     The final decision in DanC's hands, but we already decided as a WG
> not to use conformance labels. However, we do want implementers to be
> aware of security issues. So, if that text was added to section 7 as
> informative text and we substituted the words "GRDDL-aware agent" for
> "GRDDL-aware processor", would you feel like your comment has been
> addressed?
>

Of course.

In terms of "GRDDL-aware processor" I simply made a mistake.

I would be more comfortable with normative text but ...

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2007 11:15:05 UTC