- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:39:33 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org, Brian McBride <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
Great. I assume RDF/XML as the default, which I think is fine. Jeremy Dan Connolly wrote: > On Jan 17, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >> [...] >> 3) atom-grddl.xml >> >> I don't attempt to pass this yet, and would find it a lot easier if >> the xsl was changed from: >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/atom2turtle_xslt-1.0.xsl >> >> <xsl:output method="text"/> >> >> to >> >> <xsl:output method="text" media-type="text/rdf+n3" /> > > Yes, I took an action to do that in our 6 Dec meeting > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Dec/att-0011/06-grddl-wg-minutes.html__charset_us-ascii > > > OK, it's done now: > > atom2turtle_xslt-1.0.xsl,v > revision 1.2 > date: 2007/01/17 19:43:37; author: connolly; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1 > declare text/rdf+n3 media type > > testlist1.html,v > revision 1.30 > date: 2007/01/17 19:43:06; author: connolly; state: Exp; lines: +4 -3 > note unregistered text/rdf+n3 media type > > The decision we made that day involves me adding some spec text too; I > haven't > done that yet: > > "RESOLUTION: to resolve issue-output-formats by (1) adding formal rules > to cover the case of of the XSLT 1.0 and RDF/XML (2) to allow other > output formats as exemplified by the Atom/turtle test case" > >> It wouldn't harm if some of the other tests explicitly had: >> >> <xsl:output media-type="application/rdf+xml" /> > > That's probably worth doing in the future; I don't feel like changing > existing > transformations just now. If it turns out to matter in practice, let me > know. > > More on points 4+ separately... > > --Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ >
Received on Friday, 19 January 2007 12:40:10 UTC