- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:51:11 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>, public-grddl-comments@w3.org, Brian McBride <brian.mcbride@hp.com>
On Jan 17, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > [...] > 3) atom-grddl.xml > > I don't attempt to pass this yet, and would find it a lot easier if > the xsl was changed from: > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/atom2turtle_xslt-1.0.xsl > > <xsl:output method="text"/> > > to > > <xsl:output method="text" media-type="text/rdf+n3" /> Yes, I took an action to do that in our 6 Dec meeting http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2006Dec/att-0011/ 06-grddl-wg-minutes.html__charset_us-ascii OK, it's done now: atom2turtle_xslt-1.0.xsl,v revision 1.2 date: 2007/01/17 19:43:37; author: connolly; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1 declare text/rdf+n3 media type testlist1.html,v revision 1.30 date: 2007/01/17 19:43:06; author: connolly; state: Exp; lines: +4 -3 note unregistered text/rdf+n3 media type The decision we made that day involves me adding some spec text too; I haven't done that yet: "RESOLUTION: to resolve issue-output-formats by (1) adding formal rules to cover the case of of the XSLT 1.0 and RDF/XML (2) to allow other output formats as exemplified by the Atom/turtle test case" > It wouldn't harm if some of the other tests explicitly had: > > <xsl:output media-type="application/rdf+xml" /> That's probably worth doing in the future; I don't feel like changing existing transformations just now. If it turns out to matter in practice, let me know. More on points 4+ separately... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 19:51:26 UTC