[dxwg] (dcat) Support the content negotiation for ld+json (#1215)
[dxwg] Pull Request: Upstreaming tweaks applied to the REC
[dxwg] Pull Request: Upstreaming tweaks applied to the REC
Re: [dxwg] Content negotiation for http://www.w3.org/ns/dcat# (#1196)
Re: [dxwg] no content-type charset value in header of https://www.w3.org/ns/dcat.ttl (#1183)
Closed: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
RDA versioning recommendations
[dxwg] Review new DCTERMS version to check possible conflicts with DCAT2 (#1213)
dxwg-ACTION-390: Draft blog post for dcat2
dxwg-ACTION-389: Draft a pr with links to specific version of dc terms
[dxwg] new commits pushed by riccardoAlbertoni
[dxwg] Pull Request: correcting broken link to dcat errata page
[dxwg] Pull Request: correcting broken link to dcat errata page
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
DXWG Plenary 2020-01-28T21:00:00
[dxwg] Values for dcterms:conformsTo of instances dcat:DataService (sparql endpoints, for example) (#1211)
DCMI: ISO 15836 Part 2 is published based on a revision of DCMI Metadata Terms
Re: [dxwg] Add support for errata in Req track documents (e.g. DCAT) (#545)
using W3C errata process with multiple documents
dxwg-ACTION-388: Send an email to the group about the publications deadline and w3c processes
dxwg-ACTION-387: Write to the group to get discussion about repo splitting in preparation for a decision on 28 jan meeting
dxwg-ACTION-386: Write to plh to ask about #1177 and the w3c actions/intentions
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
[dxwg] Pull Request: PR for issue 1182
[dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT License cc-by 4.0 for vocabulary files
[dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT License cc-by 4.0 for vocabulary files
[dxwg] Pull Request: Created errata document...
- Re: [dxwg] Created errata document (#1209)
- Re: [dxwg] Created errata document (#1209)
- Re: [dxwg] Created errata document (#1209)
- Re: [dxwg] Created errata document (#1209)
- Re: [dxwg] Created errata document (#1209)
[dxwg] Pull Request: PR for issue 1182
- Re: [dxwg] PR for issue 1182 (#1208)
- Re: [dxwg] PR for issue 1182 (#1208)
- Re: [dxwg] PR changing config.js to enable "previous rec" and the link to the errata #1182 (#1208)
- Re: [dxwg] PR changing config.js to enable "previous rec" and the link to the errata #1182 (#1208)
- Re: [dxwg] PR changing config.js to enable "previous rec" and the link to the errata #1182 (#1208)
- Re: [dxwg] PR changing config.js to enable "previous rec" and the link to the errata #1182 (#1208)
- Re: [dxwg] PR changing config.js to enable "previous rec" and the link to the errata #1182 (#1208)
Closed: [dxwg] DCAT: Add reference to §13 / §13.1 / §13.2 (#1123)
Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Add reference to §13 / §13.1 / §13.2 (#1123)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
[dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT: Addressed #1123 + editorial fixes
[dxwg] Pull Request: DCAT: Addressed #1123 + editorial fixes
Closed: [dxwg] Possible mismatch between the stated scope in the non-normative text and the vocabulary specification (#1186)
DXWG Plenary 2020-01-21T21:00:00
Re: License for DCAT vocabulary?
Re: [dxwg] Possible mismatch between the stated scope in the non-normative text and the vocabulary specification (#1186)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
[dxwg] http or https in dcat:mediaType? (#1206)
- Re: [dxwg] http or https in dcat:mediaType? (#1206)
- Re: [dxwg] http or https in dcat:mediaType? (#1206)
Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
- Re: [dxwg] Are we superseding DCAT 1 or not once DCAT 2 is a REC? (#1177)
Closed: [dxwg] Improved link to ISO codes (#1175)
Closed: [dxwg] Bad Geonames URL (#1176)
Closed: [dxwg] Broken Creative Commons link (#1169)
Closed: [dxwg] User proper document license in W3C documents (#1192)
Re: [dxwg] User proper document license in W3C documents (#1192)
- Re: [dxwg] User proper document license in W3C documents (#1192)
- Re: [dxwg] User proper document license in W3C documents (#1192)
dxwg-ACTION-385: Ask w3c legal if we can use cc0 for the ontology given the wikipedia terms
Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT 1 PID URI incorrect (#1182)
[dxwg] Issue with dct:hasPart as described in DCAT (#1205)
[dxwg] new commits pushed by agbeltran
FW: Publishing moratorium for first half of 2020
[dxwg] new commits pushed by dr-shorthair
[dxwg] Pull Request: PR addressing #1176
[dxwg] Pull Request: PR addressing #1176
Re: [dxwg] Broken Creative Commons link (#1169)
[dxwg] Pull Request: PR Fixing #1202
[dxwg] Pull Request: PR Fixing #1202
DXWG Plenary 2020-01-14T21:00:00
[dxwg] MD_scope_codes link is dead (#1202)
Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
- Re: [dxwg] DCAT: Proposal for an updated definition for the concept “dataset” (#1195)
Re: [dxwg] Is one of dcat:accessURL, dcat:accessService and dcat:downloadURL required in a dcat:Distribution? (#1197)
- Re: [dxwg] Is one of dcat:accessURL, dcat:accessService and dcat:downloadURL required in a dcat:Distribution? (#1197)
- Re: [dxwg] Is one of dcat:accessURL, dcat:accessService and dcat:downloadURL required in a dcat:Distribution? (#1197)
- Re: [dxwg] Is one of dcat:accessURL, dcat:accessService and dcat:downloadURL required in a dcat:Distribution? (#1197)