- From: Andrea Perego via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:56:51 +0000
- To: public-dxwg-wg@w3.org
@agbeltran , in such a case, it should be enough having a folder for each spec on rec track. The only issue is that the errata template includes a section about errata not associated specifically with any spec - which I think it should be useful to have. In any case, I won't go for the option of splitting the repo - at least, not only for this reason. Said all that, I think it would be better to stick to the solution of having 1 errata document shared for all DXWG specs on rec track, also because the errata documents should be consistent across specs - and in such a case having multiple errata documents does not add much value, IMO. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andrea-perego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/issues/1182#issuecomment-576668970 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 21 January 2020 12:56:54 UTC