W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-dxwg-wg@w3.org > January 2020

Re: using W3C errata process with multiple documents

From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:50:50 -0800
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <notifications@github.com>
Cc: "public-dxwg-wg@w3.org" <public-dxwg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <17cf6b99-4f80-b039-f923-ea6467cb9478@lbl.gov>
Hi Phillippe, all, did you have any thoughts about this and the question 
of splitting the repo?

On 1/21/20 4:09 PM, Annette Greiner wrote:
> Hi Phillippe,
> The DXWG has been looking at the guidance at 
> https://github.com/w3c/display_errata, and the question came up in 
> today's meeting whether it would be possible/acceptable to use a 
> single github repo but generate a separate errata file for each of our 
> documents. We noticed that the errata instructions point out that one 
> needs to have multiple errata files set up if one has documents in 
> separate repos, but it wasn't clear whether we can have multiple 
> errata files in one repo. In our most recent discussion, the group was 
> inclined to keep the single-repo approach, since we have history for 
> all our documents in our one repo.
> -Annette (for the WG)
Annette Greiner (she)
NERSC Data and Analytics Services
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Received on Saturday, 25 January 2020 00:50:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:34 UTC