> @riccardoAlbertoni said: > > > Thank Andrea, I like the page you prepared. I only wonder if we need to keep the file LICENSE in the directory to meet the term of the license. > > I don't think so. My understanding is that that LICENSE file is related to the content of the original repo (display_errata). Also, I haven't found links from the errata document to the LICENSE file. Ok, Then I would suggest marking this PR as "ready for review" and asking the editors to review it, So that, we can get it merged by the beginning of next week. What do you think? -- GitHub Notification of comment by riccardoAlbertoni Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/1209#issuecomment-578133175 using your GitHub accountReceived on Friday, 24 January 2020 13:38:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:28:34 UTC