www-rdf-comments@w3.org from January to March 2004 by author

>

• PC Shop (Saturday, 31 January)

Bob MacGregor

• Re: RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations (Monday, 15 March)
• RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations (Saturday, 13 March)

Brian McBride

• Re: rdf-charmod-uris closed over objection [Fwd: IRI section needs too much testing to go in Fundamentals] (Friday, 19 March)
• Re: RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: Unresolved issue re media type (Monday, 5 January)
• Re: Unresolved issue re media type (Friday, 2 January)

Chris Bizer

• Usage of literals in rdf-primer figure 1 and 5 (Friday, 16 January)

Dan Connolly

• pls show outstanding dissent on Issue #rdfms-qname-uri-mapping (Monday, 29 March)
• Re: rdf-charmod-uris closed over objection [Fwd: IRI section needs too much testing to go in Fundamentals] (Friday, 19 March)
• rdf-charmod-uris closed over objection [Fwd: IRI section needs too much testing to go in Fundamentals] (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL (Monday, 5 January)

Daniel Barclay

• Re: definition problem?: appending "#foo" without removing "#" from base URI (Monday, 12 January)
• definition problem?: appending "#foo" without removing "#" from base URI (Monday, 12 January)

Dave Beckett

• Re: RFC 3023 reference in revised syntax PR (Thursday, 29 January)
• Re: definition problem?: appending "#foo" without removing "#" from base URI (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: definition problem?: appending "#foo" without removing "#" from base URI (Monday, 12 January)

David De Roure

• away from my office (Thursday, 4 March)

duerst@w3.org

• ¬dµL¦¹¤H (Wednesday, 28 January)

Elliotte Rusty Harold

• Re: Use cases for relative URIs as namespace names (Saturday, 31 January)

Eric Smith

• Your legal expertise is very urgently needed! (Wednesday, 4 February)

Frank Kaufer

• XML-Reference (Saturday, 21 February)

Frank Manola

• Re: RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: RDF Primer Comment: Links to Figures and their markup. (Tuesday, 20 January)
• Re: Usage of literals in rdf-primer figure 1 and 5 (Tuesday, 20 January)

gerald.edgar@boeing.com

• ¬dµL¦¹¤H (Thursday, 29 January)

Graham Klyne

• application/rdf+xml type and assertions (Monday, 22 March)
• Re: RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations (Tuesday, 16 March)
• Re: Media types and assertions (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: Media types and assertions (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections(was: Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL) (Tuesday, 6 January)

herman.ter.horst@philips.com

• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections(was: Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL) (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections(was: Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL) (Thursday, 8 January)

interlottery@iname.com

• CONGRATULATIONS (Saturday, 28 February)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping (Wednesday, 14 January)

jhygyj ujihuijh

• jeem,ef ,mwef w,gm m,rg ,er (Friday, 30 January)

Jos De_Roo

• Re: rdf-charmod-uris closed over objection [Fwd: IRI section needs too much testing to go in Fundamentals] (Saturday, 20 March)

Karl Dubost

• RDF Primer Comment: Links to Figures and their markup. (Tuesday, 20 January)

Karsten Otto

• Clarification of Reification vs Quotation (Saturday, 17 January)

loons fare

• Re: Please Join My group (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Please Join My group (Sunday, 8 February)
• PLEASE JOIN MY YAHOO GROUP (Saturday, 7 February)

mario zuker

• Model ships ......diferent conception.....beautiful ! (Wednesday, 24 March)

Mark Baker

• Re: application/rdf+xml type and assertions (Monday, 22 March)
• Fw: Re: Media types and assertions (Thursday, 18 March)
• Re: Media types and assertions (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: Media types and assertions (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: Media types and assertions (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: Media types and assertions (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: Media types and assertions (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: Media types and assertions (Thursday, 11 March)
• Media types and assertions (Thursday, 11 March)
• RFC 3023 reference in revised syntax PR (Friday, 16 January)
• Unresolved issue re media type (Friday, 2 January)

Nigel McFarlane

• ANN: New book: Rapid Application Development with Mozilla (Friday, 2 January)

Pat Hayes

• Re: RDF Keys, or why RDF is lousy at metadata annotations (Monday, 15 March)
• Re: Media types and assertions (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: Media types and assertions (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: Media types and assertions (Friday, 12 March)
• Re: Media types and assertions (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: Media types and assertions (Thursday, 11 March)
• Re: Clarification of Reification vs Quotation (Monday, 19 January)
• old copies of the RDF semantics document now rendered invisible. (Saturday, 17 January)
• Re: minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping (Wednesday, 14 January)
• minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections (Wednesday, 14 January)
• minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections(was: Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL) (Tuesday, 13 January)
• RDF Semantics: corrections(was: Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL) (Tuesday, 6 January)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections (Wednesday, 14 January)
• A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections (Wednesday, 14 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections (Tuesday, 13 January)
• Re: RDF Semantics: corrections (Tuesday, 13 January)

Susan Lesch

• Comment for PR-rdf-syntax-grammar-20031215 (Tuesday, 20 January)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Use cases for relative URIs as namespace names (Saturday, 31 January)

Will Smith

• Your Ship Has Come In! This Time You Are Not At The Airport! (Sunday, 25 January)
• Please Join My Superb Yahoo Forums! (Tuesday, 20 January)

±¹Á¦ÀüÈ­ ÄݶóÄÝ

• { È« º¸ } ±¹Á¦ÀüÈ­ ¹«·áÀÌ¿ë±Ç ¹Þ¾Æ°¡¼¼¿ä...^*^ (Wednesday, 7 January)
• { È« º¸ } ±¹Á¦ÀüÈ­ ¹«·áÀÌ¿ë±Ç ¹Þ¾Æ°¡¼¼¿ä...^*^ (Tuesday, 6 January)

Last message date: Monday, 29 March 2004 09:22:08 UTC