W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: RDF Semantics: two issues, connected to OWL

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 16:10:42 -0600
To: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Cc: herman.ter.horst@philips.com, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1073340642.7166.393.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Fri, 2003-12-19 at 17:59, pat hayes wrote:
> [...] So I accept that this addition to 
> the text would be an improvement, I do not feel that this is worth, 
> as it were, stopping the presses for (even if the presses could be 
> stopped, which they cannot at this stage.)

The Proposed Rec has gone out, but review of that document is
in order thru 19Jan.

Does anybody feel energized to start a new thread, garbage-collecting
all the obsolete bits, and making clear what's outstanding w.r.t.
  http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/PR-rdf-mt-20031215/
?

[...]

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 5 January 2004 17:10:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 18 February 2014 13:20:08 UTC