Re: A protest against the proposed change(s) to RDF datatyping

Note: Peter's protest is likely to have material impact on my vote.

The logic being that HP is happy with the PR documents, and we should only 
be making very low risk changes at this point. Peter's opinion, even if 
wrong, is indicative of a higher risk than is acceptable.

If this is a change of a size that is too big for an erratum then it is too 
big for this stage. I see it as lower risk to reach a consensus including 
all interested parties and have an erratum, if a change is needed.

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2004 09:20:36 UTC