- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:04:22 +0000
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, herman.ter.horst@philips.com
- Cc: connolly@w3.org, jjc@hpl.hp.com, hendler@cs.umd.edu, schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl, sandro@w3.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org
Pat, I have: - taken a copy of http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_2004bb.html - removed three pairs of bad chars (emacs displayed them as ^@^@), one pair each on source lines 2080, 3112 and 3943. These were causing validation failures - copied the modified file to the ed's working draft space in cvs http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ - posted an html diff to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/thread.html (can't give the full link - there seems to be a delay for it showing in the archive. You may want to check the accuracy of the htmldiff when it shows up. Peter, Herman can you confirm that these changes are ok with you. Brian pat hayes wrote: > > > Further to my previous message, the editing process apparently > introduced many small changes to the PR text. For a corrected version > (produced using BBedit for safety), please see > > http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_2004bb.html > > There is a small change to the text a few paragraphs below the anchor: > > http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_2004bb.html#defDinterp > > which points out that by virtue of a D-interpretation being an rdfs > interpretation, the datatype classes are required to be subsets of LV. > Herman, if you are reading this, it is now too late to change the RDFS > conditions and rules (see rdfs13). > > Pat
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2004 17:09:01 UTC