I found myself looking at the history of this issue today http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qname-uri-mapping I see the WG's decision did not get consensus of the reviewers. "I find this unacceptable for the following reasons ..." -- Borden http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JanMar/0014.html and Bray followed up http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002JanMar/0016.html The issues list just says "Currently: closed (response)" I'd like the issues list to show that the outstanding dissent from Borden and Bray. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?Received on Monday, 29 March 2004 09:22:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Tuesday, 25 October 2005 18:07:32 GMT