It seems that: - there have been a couple more typo corrections since I took my snapshot - I messed up sending the diff so I'll regenerate the diff tomorrow morning as its a getting a little late here. Brian Brian McBride wrote: > > Pat, > > I have: > > - taken a copy of > http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_2004bb.html > > - removed three pairs of bad chars (emacs displayed them as ^@^@), one > pair each on source lines 2080, 3112 and 3943. These were causing > validation failures > > - copied the modified file to the ed's working draft space in cvs > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/ > > - posted an html diff to > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/thread.html > (can't give the full link - there seems to be a delay for it showing in > the archive. > > You may want to check the accuracy of the htmldiff when it shows up. > > Peter, Herman can you confirm that these changes are ok with you. > > Brian > > > pat hayes wrote: > >> >> >> Further to my previous message, the editing process apparently >> introduced many small changes to the PR text. For a corrected version >> (produced using BBedit for safety), please see >> >> http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_2004bb.html >> >> There is a small change to the text a few paragraphs below the anchor: >> >> http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_2004bb.html#defDinterp >> >> which points out that by virtue of a D-interpretation being an rdfs >> interpretation, the datatype classes are required to be subsets of >> LV. Herman, if you are reading this, it is now too late to change the >> RDFS conditions and rules (see rdfs13). >> >> PatReceived on Wednesday, 14 January 2004 17:38:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 21 September 2012 14:16:33 GMT