W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-comments@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: minimizing the textual changes to RDF semantics

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:34:26 +0000
Message-ID: <4005C3F2.2000706@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, herman.ter.horst@philips.com, connolly@w3.org, jjc@hpl.hp.com, hendler@cs.umd.edu, schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl, sandro@w3.org, www-rdf-comments@w3.org

It seems that:

   - there have been a couple more typo corrections since I took my snapshot

   - I messed up sending the diff

so I'll regenerate the diff tomorrow morning as its a getting a little 
late here.

Brian


Brian McBride wrote:

> 
> Pat,
> 
> I have:
> 
>   - taken a copy of 
> http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_2004bb.html
> 
>   - removed three pairs of bad chars (emacs displayed them as ^@^@), one 
> pair each on source lines 2080, 3112 and 3943.  These were causing 
> validation failures
> 
>   - copied the modified file to the ed's working draft space in cvs
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/
> 
>   - posted an html diff to 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2004Jan/thread.html
> (can't give the full link - there seems to be a delay for it showing in 
> the archive.
> 
> You may want to check the accuracy of the htmldiff when it shows up.
> 
> Peter, Herman can you confirm that these changes are ok with you.
> 
> Brian
> 
> 
> pat hayes wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> Further to my previous message, the editing process apparently 
>> introduced many small changes to the PR text. For a corrected version 
>> (produced using BBedit for safety), please see
>>
>> http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_2004bb.html
>>
>> There is a small change to the text a few paragraphs below the anchor:
>>
>> http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semantics_2004bb.html#defDinterp
>>
>> which points out that by virtue of a D-interpretation being an rdfs 
>> interpretation, the datatype classes are required to be subsets of 
>> LV.  Herman, if you are reading this, it is now too late to change the 
>> RDFS conditions and rules (see rdfs13).
>>
>> Pat
Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2004 17:38:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 18 February 2014 13:20:08 UTC