public-wai-ert@w3.org from October 2006 by author

Carlos A Velasco

• Re: validity levels (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: validity levels (Monday, 23 October)

Carlos Iglesias

• RE: EARL security/privacy concerns (Friday, 27 October)
• RE: EARL security/privacy concerns (Wednesday, 25 October)
• RE: validity levels (Wednesday, 25 October)
• RE: validity levels (Monday, 23 October)
• EARL security/privacy concerns (Monday, 23 October)
• RE: does file content deserve its own class? (Wednesday, 18 October)
• RE: does file content deserve its own class? (Wednesday, 18 October)
• RE: does file content deserve its own class? (Wednesday, 11 October)
• RE: ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Wednesday 4 October, 2006 (Wednesday, 4 October)
• RE: test subject is a local file (Wednesday, 4 October)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: EARL security/privacy concerns (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: EARL security/privacy concerns (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: validity levels (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: validity levels (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: validity levels (Thursday, 19 October)
• My email getting bounced from Shane (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Re: ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Wednesday 18 October, 2006 (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Re: Design problem with "HTTP vocabulary in RDF" (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Re: ICRA Response to Call for Review: Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema Working Draft] (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Re: test subject is a local file (Wednesday, 4 October)
• Re: ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Wednesday 4 October, 2006 (Tuesday, 3 October)

David

• Re: validity levels (Thursday, 19 October)

Jim Ley

• Re: ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Wednesday 4 October, 2006 (Wednesday, 4 October)

Johannes Koch

• Re: EARL security/privacy concerns (Thursday, 26 October)
• Re: validity levels (Wednesday, 25 October)
• sequences in the HTTP vocabulary (Wednesday, 25 October)
• Re: validity levels (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: validity levels (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: validity levels (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: validity levels (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: validity levels (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: validity levels (Thursday, 19 October)
• validity levels (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: does file content deserve its own class? (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Re: does file content deserve its own class? (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Re: Design problem with "HTTP vocabulary in RDF" (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Design problem with "HTTP vocabulary in RDF" (Friday, 13 October)
• Re: does file content deserve its own class? (Thursday, 12 October)

Karl Dubost

• Re: test subject is a local file (Wednesday, 4 October)

Paul Walsh, Segala

• RE: validity levels (Monday, 23 October)
• RE: validity levels (Monday, 23 October)
• RE: validity levels (Thursday, 19 October)

Phil Archer

• ICRA Response to Call for Review: Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema Working Draft] (Monday, 16 October)

Shadi Abou-Zahra

• usage of uri:uri (Monday, 30 October)
• Proposal for FileContent class (Monday, 30 October)
• Re: sequences in the HTTP vocabulary (Monday, 30 October)
• daylight saving time (Sunday, 29 October)
• Minutes for Teleconference on 25 October, 2006 (Wednesday, 25 October)
• ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Wednesday 25 October, 2006 (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: EARL security/privacy concerns (Tuesday, 24 October)
• [TSD TF] Minutes for Teleconference on 24 October, 2006 (Tuesday, 24 October)
• Re: validity levels (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: validity levels (Monday, 23 October)
• Re: validity levels (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: validity levels (Thursday, 19 October)
• Minutes for Teleconference on 18 October, 2006 (Wednesday, 18 October)
• attempt to summarize issues with test subjects (Wednesday, 18 October)
• Re: does file content deserve its own class? (Wednesday, 18 October)
• ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Wednesday 18 October, 2006 (Tuesday, 17 October)
• [TSD TF] Minutes for Teleconference on 17 October, 2006 (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Re: ICRA Response to Call for Review: Evaluation and Report Language (EARL) 1.0 Schema Working Draft] (Tuesday, 17 October)
• Re: Design problem with "HTTP vocabulary in RDF" (Tuesday, 17 October)
• REMINDER: no ERT WG meeting today (Wednesday, 11 October)
• [TSD TF] Minutes for Teleconference on 10 October, 2006 (Tuesday, 10 October)
• an "easy read" article on EARL (Monday, 9 October)
• does file content deserve its own class? (Thursday, 5 October)
• Minutes for Teleconference on 4 October, 2006 (Wednesday, 4 October)
• [updated] HTTP Vocabulary in RDF (Wednesday, 4 October)
• [TSD TF] Minutes for Teleconference on 3 October, 2006 (Wednesday, 4 October)
• ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Wednesday 4 October, 2006 (Tuesday, 3 October)
• test subject is a local file (Tuesday, 3 October)

Shane Anderson

• Re: ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Wednesday 18 October, 2006 (Wednesday, 18 October)

Last message date: Monday, 30 October 2006 16:35:49 UTC