W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > October 2006

RE: does file content deserve its own class?

From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:12:26 +0200
Message-ID: <09700B613C4DD84FA9F2FEA521882819016CB585@ayalga.fundacionctic.org>
To: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>
Cc: "Johannes Koch" <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>, <public-wai-ert@w3.org>

 
Hi Shadi,

WOW! You're really fast ;oD

> Carlos Iglesias wrote:
> > Should we redefine the WebContent class as "Information 
>> that is PUBLICLY AVALAIBLE on the World Wide Web" and then 
>> create a "NonPublicContent" that includes file content, 
>> password protected content, etc.?
> 
> Sometimes information on the World Wide Web (however you define the
> scope) *is* password protected or needs a form to be filled out etc.
> 
> Really tricky separating these issues from each other...

You're right. I suppose we could manage just with the HTTP-in-RDF corresponding properties to help us distinguish authentication and proxy cases.

Regards,
 CI.

 
--------------------------------------

Carlos Iglesias

CTIC Foundation
Science and Technology Park of Gijón
33203 - Gijón, Asturias, Spain 

phone: +34 984291212
fax: +34 984390612
email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org
URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2006 11:12:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:27 GMT