- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:20:54 +0200
- To: ERT group <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Charles McCathieNevile schrieb: > I think we need to say that implementors should find their own class as > a subClass of pass, cannotTell, etc. Different people use different > types of warning and putting one in is IMHO asking for people to get it > wrong, break the interoperability, and make it useless - eventually > forcing implementors to use their own or find one that has been used > cleanly and is a subtype of... [return to the beginning] So for interoperability reading the additional RDFS is necessary. Otherwise an EARL consumer would not know if my self-defined foo validity level is a pass, cannotTell, fail, ... in basic EARL terms. -- Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2006 13:21:12 UTC