W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > October 2006

Re: validity levels

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 15:20:54 +0200
Message-ID: <45377BB6.7040202@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: ERT group <public-wai-ert@w3.org>

Charles McCathieNevile schrieb:
> I think we need to say that implementors should find their own class as 
> a subClass of pass, cannotTell, etc. Different people use different 
> types of warning and putting one in is IMHO asking for people to get it 
> wrong, break the interoperability, and make it useless - eventually 
> forcing implementors to use their own or find one that has been used 
> cleanly and is a subtype of... [return to the beginning]

So for interoperability reading the additional RDFS is necessary. 
Otherwise an EARL consumer would not know if my self-defined foo 
validity level is a pass, cannotTell, fail, ... in basic EARL terms.
-- 
Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2006 13:21:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:27 GMT