- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:41:06 +0200
- To: 'ERT group' <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Paul Walsh, Segala schrieb: > Also, I have never witnessed the use of 'warnings' by testing professionals, > so I'd hate to introduce new terminology that isn't necessary. As Shadi > says, "some tools misuse 'warning' as a conditional pass". And some use a warning for additional information that the user id not directly ask for (e.g. foreground/background colour things in W3C's CSS validator). The don't effect the validity of the tested subject. > I think these tools are misused, some users assume they can measure > compliance, this means 'warning' equals 'pass'. Scary! That's right. So don't call it warning. But I still see the need for interoperably subclassing the "standard" validity levels. -- Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2006 15:04:10 UTC