W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > October 2006

Re: does file content deserve its own class?

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:56:38 +0200
Message-ID: <45360866.4060506@w3.org>
To: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
Cc: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>, public-wai-ert@w3.org

Hi,

Carlos Iglesias wrote:
> Should we redefine the WebContent class as "Information that is PUBLICLY AVALAIBLE on the World Wide Web" and then create a "NonPublicContent" that includes file content, password protected content, etc.?

Sometimes information on the World Wide Web (however you define the 
scope) *is* password protected or needs a form to be filled out etc.

Really tricky separating these issues from each other...

Regards,
   Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2006 10:56:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:27 GMT