W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > October 2006

RE: ERT WG: Agenda for teleconference on Wednesday 4 October, 2006

From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 03:10:26 +0200
Message-ID: <09700B613C4DD84FA9F2FEA5218828190E7DCF@ayalga.fundacionctic.org>
To: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>, <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Regrets for today's TC, still at "Fundamentos Web"

Some thoughts below,

>AGENDA:
>
>1. test subjects is a local file
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Oct/0000>
> - how to describe local files that are test subjects?
> - is there a need to record the contents of the files?

Already commented in the relevant thread.

>2. using rdf:about and/or uri:uri in WebContent
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Sep/0056>
> - can rdf:about adequately replace uri:uri?

Don't think so, but not sure.

>3. location of "Extensibility" section
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues#extensibility>
> - does "Extensibility" belong in the Schema or in the Guide?

If it doesn't affect to the schema it should be in the Guide

>4. location of "Schema" appendix
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues#schema-rdf>
> - the RDF schema will be available at the namespace location
> - do we want to keep a copy inside this document as well?

I think it's not necessary

>5. prepare for reviewing "HTTP Vocabulary in RDF"
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/HTTP/WD-HTTP-in-RDF-20060705>
> - is this document ready for publication?

Can't see any problem


Regards,
 CI.
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2006 01:10:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:27 GMT