public-owl-comments@w3.org from March 2009 by thread

[LC response] To Frank van Harmelen Ian Horrocks (Monday, 30 March)

[LC response] To Frank van Harmelen Ian Horrocks (Monday, 30 March)

[LC response] To Jeremy Caroll Ian Horrocks (Monday, 30 March)

[LC response] To Jeremy Caroll Ian Horrocks (Monday, 30 March)

[LC response] To SWD WG Ian Horrocks (Monday, 30 March)

[LC response] To Jeremy Carroll Ian Horrocks (Monday, 30 March)

patterns for searchable representation of quantifiable objects Wolfgang Orthuber (Monday, 30 March)

[Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: Editorial comments on RDF-based semantics Michael Schneider (Friday, 27 March)

[LC response] To Jonathan Rees Ian Horrocks (Friday, 27 March)

[LC response] To Marko Luther Ian Horrocks (Friday, 27 March)

[LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2 Ian Horrocks (Friday, 27 March)

[LC Response] To Jonas von Malottki Re: OWL2 Ian Horrocks (Friday, 27 March)

[LC response] To Bijan Parsia Ian Horrocks (Friday, 27 March)

[LC response] To Tom Morris Ian Horrocks (Friday, 27 March)

[LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: Editorial comments on RDF-based semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 25 March)

[LC response] To Ivan Herman- LC comment on OWL 2 QL Uli Sattler (Wednesday, 25 March)

[LC response] To Roman Kontchakov & Michael Zakharyaschev- LC comment on OWL 2 QL Uli Sattler (Wednesday, 25 March)

[LC response] To Maurizio Lenzerini, Diego Calvanese, Giuseppe De Giacomo, Riccardo Rosati - LC comment on OWL 2 QL Uli Sattler (Wednesday, 25 March)

[LC response] To Marijke Keet Ian Horrocks (Monday, 23 March)

Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler (was Re: Fwd: Question re: HasKey entailments) Jim Hendler (Monday, 23 March)

Comment received and ackowledged Alan Rector (Thursday, 19 March)

OWL Last Call comment Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 19 March)

OWL Last Call comment Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 19 March)

OWL Last Call comment Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 19 March)

[LC response] To SWD WG Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 19 March)

[LC response] To Jeremy Carroll Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 19 March)

[LC response] To Jeremy Carroll Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 19 March)

[LC response] To Matthew Horridge Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 19 March)

[LC response] To Michael Schneider Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 19 March)

[LC response] To Jeremy Carroll Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 19 March)

[LC response] To Guus Schreiber Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 19 March)

[LC response] To Jeremy Carroll Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 19 March)

[LC response] To Frank van Harmelen Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 19 March)

[LC response] To Frank van Harmelen Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 19 March)

[LC response] To Jeremy Carroll Ian Horrocks (Thursday, 19 March)

[LC Response #2] to Jan Wielemaker, Re: Triples and OWL2 Ivan Herman (Wednesday, 18 March)

[LC response] To Jonathan Rees Boris Motik (Wednesday, 18 March)

[LC response] To Jonathan Rees Boris Motik (Wednesday, 18 March)

[LC Response] To Jos de Bruijn Re: why restrict the set of datatypes in OWL 2 RL profile? Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 18 March)

[LC Response] To Chris Welty Re: non-disjoint value spaces for numeric datatypes Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 18 March)

[LC Response] To M. Scott Marshall Re: OWL2 comments Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 18 March)

[LC Response] To Jacco van Ossenbruggen Re: Confusion about the status of the XML Serialisation syntax Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 18 March)

[LC Response] To Jonas von Malottki Re: OWL2 Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 18 March)

[LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2 Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 18 March)

[LC Response] To Jos de Bruijn Re: a few comments about the OWL 2 drafts Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 18 March)

[LC response] To Michael Schneider Re: Clarify what it means that the value in a facet-value pair (F v) is an "arbitrary object" Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 18 March)

[LC response] To Marko Luther Ian Horrocks (Monday, 16 March)

Re: [LC response] To Jim Hendler Alan Ruttenberg (Wednesday, 11 March)

[LC response] To Jan Hladik Ian Horrocks (Friday, 6 March)

[LC response] To Kaarel Kaljurand Ian Horrocks (Friday, 6 March)

[LC response] To Jos de Bruijn Ian Horrocks (Friday, 6 March)

RE: [LC Response] To Ralf Moeller Re: OWL2 Michael Schneider (Friday, 6 March)

Re: [LC response] To Ralf Moeller Michael Schneider (Thursday, 5 March)

Re: [LC Response] To Mike Smith - Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern Mike Smith (Thursday, 5 March)

Re: [LC Response] To Mike Smith - Re: Comment on RDF Mapping: variables in sequence pattern Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 5 March)

[LC response] To Jonathan Rees Ivan Herman (Thursday, 5 March)

[LC response] To Andrea Splendiani Ivan Herman (Thursday, 5 March)

[LC Response] To Chimezie Ogbuji Re: Comments for OWL2-RL profile Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 4 March)

[LC Response] To Jonathan Rees Re: The two imports closure definitions disagree Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 4 March)

[LC Response] To Marijke Keet Re: haskey clarification Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 4 March)

[LC Response] To Frank van Harmelen Re: General comments on OWL2 design Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 4 March)

[LC Response] To Chris Welty Re: RIF perspective on supported datatypes Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 4 March)

[LC response] To Michael Schneider Re: LC Comment: "lexical value" vs. "lexical form" Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Wednesday, 4 March)

[LC Response] To Jeremy Rogers (Re: OWL2 annotations) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Tuesday, 3 March)

[LC response] To Michael Schneider Boris Motik (Monday, 2 March)

Re: Re 2: [LC Response] to Jan Wielemaker, Re: Triples and OWL2 Jan Wielemaker (Monday, 2 March)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 March 2009 23:15:14 UTC