Dear Marijke, Thank you for your comment <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-comments/ 2009Mar/0014.html> on the OWL 2 Web Ontology Language last call drafts. We changed the text in Section 9.5 of the OWL 2 Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax [1] to talk about (lack of) functionality and to include an example. Does this adequately address your concerns? [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax#Keys Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-owl- comments@w3.org> (replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response to your comment. Regards, Ian Horrocks on behalf of the W3C OWL Working GroupReceived on Monday, 23 March 2009 17:50:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 23 March 2009 17:50:48 GMT